SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Hindrance of Conservation Biology by Delays in the Submission of Manuscripts
11 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Hindrance of Conservation Biology by Delays in the Submission of Manuscripts (2010)Hindrance of Conservation Biology by Dela…The Golden Rule of Reviewing (2009)The Golden Rule of ReviewingMulti-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science (2008)Multi-University Research Tea…The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting (2007)Editorial and publication del…Rejections and the importance of first response times (2004)Rejections and the importance…Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts (2002)Slow-moving journals hinder c…Crisis in a Crisis Discipline (2001)Crisis in a Crisis DisciplineCompetition and Careers in Biosciences (2001)Competition and Careers in Bi…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…Time Lapse between Hypothesis and Publication in the Medical Sciences (1975)Time Lapse between Hypothesis…Scientific Information Exchange in Psychology (1964)Scientific Information Exchan…Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts (1981)Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 (2006)Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes (2008)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The Role of the Priority Rule in Science (2003)What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? (2012)I Like, I Cite? Do Facebook Likes Predict the Impact of Scientific Work? (2015)Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com (2020)Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. (1971)The General Medical Journal: For Readers or Repositories? (1977)Factor de impacto de las revistas médicas españolas (2004)Constructing the Genome Commons (2014)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2014)Knowledge and Competitive Advantage (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms (2010)Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact (2013)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Australian Research Output in Economics and Business: High Volume, Low Impact? (2005)The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast? (2005)Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies (2007)A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias? (1982)The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)21st-century biomedical journals: failures and futures (2003)Twenty‐five years of Zoo Biology: a publication analysis (2008)Trade-off between urgency and reduced editorial capacity affect publication speed in ecological and medical journals during 2020 (2021)Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner & Resh (2010) (2011)Modeling peer review: an agent-based approach (2012)A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 2008Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science800 cited
  • 1964Scientific Information Exchange in Psychology118 cited
  • 2001Competition and Careers in Biosciences105 cited
  • 2007Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting71 cited
  • 2009The Golden Rule of Reviewing60 cited
  • 2004Rejections and the importance of first response times48 cited
  • 2002Slow-moving journals hinder conservation efforts48 cited
  • 1975Time Lapse between Hypothesis and Publication in the Medical Sciences40 cited
  • 2001Crisis in a Crisis Discipline30 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work