Quality of clinical studies in neurosurgical journals: signs of improvement over three decades

Kanna K Gnanalingham · James Russell Tysome · Juan Martinez-Canca · Sinan A. Barazi

48 citations0/0 files storedJournal of neurosurgery

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of clinical studies appearing in neurosurgical journals during three decades. METHODS: Clinical studies published in 1982, 1992, and 2002 in Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery (JNS), and British Journal of Neurosurgery (BJN) were evaluated. The feature study types were categorized as follows: Type 1, prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs); Type 2, other prospective studies; Type 3, retrospective case-controlled and cross-sectional studies; and Type 4, case reports. Among a total of 786 articles, the following study types were identified: Type 1, eight (1%); Type 2, 46 (6%); Type 3, 81 (10%); and Type 4, 651 (83%). Overall, the proportion of study types did not differ among journals. Between 1982 and 2002, increases in the proportion of study Types 1 (0 compared with 2%, respectively), 2 (4 compared with 10%, respectively), and 3 (5 compared with 13%, respectively) and decreases in the proportion of study Type 4 (92 compared with 75%, respectively; p < 0.001) were apparent only in JNS and Neurosurgery (p < 0.01). Between 1982 and 2002, the median number of patients (two compared with 14, respectively) and the mean number of authors per study (3.4 compared with 4.8, respectively) increased (p < 0.001). The JNS had a greater mean number of authors per study than the other journals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the three decades evaluated, case reports remained the predominant study design in these prominent neurosurgical journals, notwithstanding the modest increases in study Types 1 and 2 and the associated escalations in author and patient numbers in the same period.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

1994The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals 1979Clinical Research in General Medical Journals 1996Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.1989Archie Cochrane in his own words 1984The Series of Consecutive Cases as a Device for Assessing Outcomes of Intervention 2000How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research

Cited by

2013Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor 2009Quality of Clinical Studies in Aesthetic Surgery Journals: A 10-Year Review 2014Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature 2014The Role of Neurosurgery Journals in Evidence-Based Neurosurgical Care 2011Clinical research and diagnostic efficacy studies in the oral and maxillofacial radiology literature: 1996–2005 2013Quality and quantity of research publications by Iranian neurosurgeons: Signs of scientific progress over the past decades

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.