SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do the Justices Vote Like Policy Makers? Evidence from Scaling the Supreme Court with Interest Groups
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Do the Justices Vote Like Policy Makers? Evidence from Scaling the Supreme Court with Interest Groups (2015)Do the Justices Vote Like Policy Makers? …The University of Chicago Law Review (2017)The University of Chicago Law…New York University Law Review (2017)New York University Law ReviewThe Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy (2009)The Separation of Powers, Cou…The Judicial Common Space (2007)The Judicial Common SpaceSpatial Models of Parliamentary Voting (2005)Spatial Models of Parliamenta…The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)The Supreme Court and the Att…Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimatio…Measuring Issue Salience (2000)Measuring Issue SalienceThe choices justices make (1997)The choices justices makeLinear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators (1997)Linear Probability Models of …Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators (1996)Linear Probability Models of …Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy (1990)Congressional Influence on Bu…Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Ideological Values and the Vo…52. A Matter of Principle (1986)52. A Matter of PrincipleThe Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1966)The Least Dangerous Branch: T…North Carolina Law Review (1927)North Carolina Law ReviewThe magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Democratic politics in the European Parliament (2008)Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace (2011)Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality? (2013)A theory of data. (1960)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Handbook of social psychology (1990)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data (1995)The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures (2011)Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2013)Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2014)A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas (2013)Logics in Action (2013)Culturally Responsive School Leadership (2016)DOES PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORK? AN ASSESSMENT TOOL (2008)The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a 'social market economy' (2009)Foundations of Public Law (2010)Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda (2004)MARKETS AND FREEDOMS: ACHIEVEMENTS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE MARKET MECHANISM IN PROMOTING INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS (1993)Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice (2005)Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007)Examining Transformational Resistance Through a Critical Race and Latcrit Theory Framework (2001)Critical Race Theory, Latino Critical Theory, and Critical Raced-Gendered Epistemologies: Recognizing Students of Color as Holders and Creators of Knowledge (2002)Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe (2006)The Economics of Privacy (2016)Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion (2019)When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction (2019)A General Theory of Domination and Justice (2010)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017New York University Law Review2,872 cited
  • 2017The University of Chicago Law Review2,003 cited
  • 1927North Carolina Law Review1,724 cited
  • 198652. A Matter of Principle1,370 cited
  • 2002The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited1,172 cited
  • 2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
  • 1966The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics932 cited
  • 1997The choices justices make794 cited
  • 1989Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices731 cited
  • 2005Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting637 cited
  • 1990Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy501 cited
  • 2000Measuring Issue Salience496 cited
  • 2007The Judicial Common Space404 cited
  • 1996Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators351 cited
  • 1997Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators323 cited
  • 2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy
321 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.