this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2014The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values2,308 cited
- 1993Report of NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation1,946 cited
- 1994Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?1,927 cited
- 1991Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation1,823 cited
- 2002Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques1,384 cited
- 1999Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method1,295 cited
- 2001Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence1,228 cited
- 1993Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment1,115 cited
- 2001Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin?1,112 cited
- 2005A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation1,101 cited
- 1998Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment1,051 cited
- 2001What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?1,003 cited
- 2002A Review of WTA/WTP Studies893 cited
- 2004Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks813 cited
- 2009The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work