Reportgreen2005

Whole-of-government: does working together work?

19 citations0/0 files storedANU Open Research (Australian National University)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Public Administration in Developing Nations

Abstract

The idea of whole-of-government processes as a pathway to more efficient and integrated government has risen in popularity in Australia over the past decade. Despite fairly widespread support for the principles of whole-of-government, a number of issues require serious consideration. The major areas of potential difficulty arise in relation to ensuring accountability for publicly funded activities, overcoming the silos created by departmentalism or vertical styles of management, and balancing inclusion in public policy development with the unwelcome effect of ‘many hands’, namely fragmentation and lack of coordination. In addition, and absent from much of the specific public administration literature on whole-of-government, is a consideration of the role of interpersonal relationships and individual behaviour as they impact on organisational values, ethics and culture. Four operational levels of ‘joining’ in the public sector are also identified, namely interdepartmental, intradepartmental, intergovernmental and intersectoral. Then, current whole-of government mechanisms at work in the Australian Department of Health and Ageing for developing child and youth health policy are identified and described in relation to these levels. Differences are observed and analysed between the child health and the youth health processes. Knowledge and attitudes of public servants to the whole-of-government vision are also seen as critical for the success of whole-of-government. Interviews with a sample of Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) officers with a key role in child and youth health policy development provide some experiential learning about the essence of the barriers and practical ingredients for success.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

2000‘Accountability’: An Ever‐Expanding Concept?1998Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co‐Ordination 2002Delivering joined–up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems 2001Departmentalism and joined-up government 2002Governance in Whitehall 2003Collaborative solutions or new policy problems: exploring multi-agency partnerships in education and health work 2002Public Sector Governance — Future Issues for Australia 2002Accountability and Joined‐up Government

Cited by

2011Opportunities to reduce health inequalities by ‘Health in All Policies’ in the Netherlands: An explorative study on the national level 2011Whole-of-government approach to information technology strategy management: Building a sustainable collaborative technology environment in government 2017Post-NPM and re-centralisation: current themes in Europe and Turkey 2007Strange bedfellows: Whole-of-government policy, Shared Responsibility Agreements, and Implications for Regional Governance 2005Reinventing Government in Australia : Whole-of-Government in a Federation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.