SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
0 references·16 citing·37 second hop
Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Sci…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Sample Selection in Systemati…Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019 (2020)Why and how to merge Scopus a…Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Mapping the Evolution of Soci…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals (2020)A systematic scoping review o…Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: a review and research agenda (2019)Managing climate change risks…Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Comparing Bibliometric Analys…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science (2019)A Criteria-based Assessment o…Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis (2018)Knowledge management: A globa…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Suitability of Google Scholar…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)A Detailed Review of Artificial Intelligence Applied in the Fashion and Apparel Industry (2019)Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Omicron Variant from 2020 to 2022 in the Scopus Database Using R and VOSviewer (2022)Practical guidance on bibliometric analysis and mapping knowledge domains methodology – A summary (2022)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda (2023)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal (2024)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Strategic management a stakeholder approach (2010)Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2018)Measuring the progress of smart destinations: The use of indicators as a management tool (2020)Perceived social impacts of tourism and quality-of-life: a new conceptual model (2020)Sustainability and Tourism Marketing: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications between 1997 and 2020 Using VOSviewer Software (2021)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)The digital divide: A review and future research agenda (2021)Artificial intelligence and big data analytics for supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review (2022)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,085 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers1,554 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2020A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals655 cited
  • 2021Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research634 cited
  • 2019Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases593 cited
  • 2018Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis561 cited
  • 2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature486 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research481 cited
  • 2020Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019426 cited
  • 2019Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: a review and research agenda417 cited
  • 2019A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science343 cited