Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies

5 references·5 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard404 cited
2013A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies283 cited
1999Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test240 cited
2013Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review217 cited
2013Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research105 cited

Cited by

2018Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard56 cited
2018Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research51 cited
2018Design, statistical analysis and reporting standards for test accuracy studies for infectious diseases in animals: Progress, challenges and recommendations24 cited
2019Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study20 cited
2018Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work