SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance
16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled
Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance (2015)Impacted Science: Impact Is Not ImportanceThe top 100 papers (2014)The top 100 papersSan Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)San Francisco Declaration on …Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)The weakening relationship be…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics (2009)The impact factor's Matthew E…The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation (2008)The top-ten in journal impact…The mismeasurement of science (2007)The mismeasurement of scienceCambridge Dictionaries Online (2007)Cambridge Dictionaries OnlineThe History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Journal Prestige, Publication…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The Merriam-Webster Dictionary (1983)The Merriam-Webster DictionaryThe Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe changing roles of scientific journals (2024)The changing roles of scienti…Current Scientific Research Trends on Salivary Biomarkers: A Bibliometric Analysis (2022)Current Scientific Research T…Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions (2022)Article-processing charges as…Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis (2020)Women Are Underrepresented an…Indicadores de Citación y Relevancia Científica: Genealogía de una Representación (2020)Indicadores de Citación y Rel…Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space (2019)Journal Impact Factor: A Bump…Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis (2018)Citation classics in pediatri…Support Science by Publishing in Scientific Society Journals (2017)Support Science by Publishing…Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture (2017)Clarivate Analytics: Continue…Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research (2017)Article-level assessment of i…Towards an open science publishing platform (2016)Towards an open science publi…The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal (2016)The ethics of peer and editor…Peer review: from recognition to improved practices (2016)Peer review: from recognition…Debasing the Currency of Science: The Growing Menace of Predatory Open Access Journals (2016)Debasing the Currency of Scie…ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites (2016)ASM Journals Eliminate Impact…A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)A Framework for Improving the…STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)What are 'good' depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis (2015)The 52 symptoms of major depression: Lack of content overlap among seven common depression scales (2016)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Seizing intellectual power: The dialogue at the New York African Burial Ground (1997)Cultural competence in nursing: A concept analysis (2019)Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 1983The Merriam-Webster Dictionary884 cited
  • 2002Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals643 cited
  • 2014The top 100 papers510 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2013San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment312 cited
  • 2007The mismeasurement of science296 cited
  • 2012The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age292 cited
  • 2008The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation251 cited
  • 2009The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics233 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2007Cambridge Dictionaries Online207 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis62 cited
    • 2016A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences46 cited
    • 2019Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space43 cited
    • 2016Debasing the Currency of Science: The Growing Menace of Predatory Open Access Journals36 cited
    • 2016The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal36 cited
    • 2016Towards an open science publishing platform34 cited
    • 2017Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research34 cited
    • 2022Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions33 cited
    • 2016ASM Journals Eliminate Impact Factor Information from Journal Websites30 cited
    • 2017Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture29 cited
    • 2018Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis27 cited
    • 2016Peer review: from recognition to improved practices21 cited
    • 2020Indicadores de Citación y Relevancia Científica: Genealogía de una Representación19 cited
    • 2017Support Science by Publishing in Scientific Society Journals18 cited
    • 2024The changing roles of scientific journals18 cited
    • 2022Current Scientific Research Trends on Salivary Biomarkers: A Bibliometric Analysis13 cited