SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
4 references·16 citing·46 second hop
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Risk of bias versus quality a…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)The emergence of large langua…Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)Large language models for con…How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)How to optimize the systemati…Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Automated Paper Screening for…Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automati…Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living systematic review (2021)Data extraction methods for s…Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence and t…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation (2020)SWIFT-Active Screener: Accele…Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Development, testing and use …Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Considering bias and conflict…Collecting data (2019)Collecting dataPrioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study (2018)Prioritising references for s…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions (2017)Recommendations for assessing…How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? (2015)How to conduct systematic rev…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014)Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (2016)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A topography of climate change research (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Body image disturbance and sexual orientation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How Common Is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does It Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review (2020)Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies (2020)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Generative artificial intelligence use in evidence synthesis: A systematic review (2025)The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies (2019)Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Impact of Mentoring on Academic Career Success for Women in Medicine: A Systematic Review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews298 cited
  • 2019Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies258 cited
  • 2017Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions221 cited
  • 2023Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study205 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2021Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review189 cited
  • 2020SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation157 cited
  • 2025The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review154 cited
  • 2020Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance149 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study148 cited
  • 2025Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review146 cited
  • 2024How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools129 cited
  • 2019Collecting data126 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews106 cited
  • 2021Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living systematic review106 cited
  • 2015How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?104 cited