Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Exploring a Counterintuitive Finding with Methodological Implications Why is 9 > 221 in a Between-subjects Design?

8 references·2 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010Research Methods, Design, and Analysis897 cited
1976Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use?524 cited
1999How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design.229 cited
1973Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs.196 cited
1978Graphic rating scales — How many categories?188 cited
1987Psychometric Properties of Four 5-Point Likert Type Response Scales94 cited
1960The Effect of Distributional Skewing upon Judgment with Free Choice of Scale6 cited
2001Factors Affecting Subjective Estimates of Magnitude: When is 9 > 221?4 cited

Cited by

2013Comparing the Perceived Size of 9 with 221 and with 2143: Biasing Effects of Inferred Context in a Between-Subjects Design3 cited
2019Illusory inconsistencies in judgment: Stimulus-evoked reference sets and between-subjects designs3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work