This essay considers how counterfactuals should be evaluated on the assumption that determinism is true. It argues against Lewis's influential view that if anything had happened that did not actually happen, the actual laws of nature would have been false, and defends the competing view that history would have been different—but only microscopically different—all the way back.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 120 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.