The rationale for developing and outcome batteriesfor routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research implementing core

Abstract

The Department of Health (DoH; 1996) Strategic Review of Psychotherapy identified the need for practitioners to use similar outcome measures as part of the framework of clinical effectiveness. In this paper, we present the rationale for developing and implementing a core outcome battery in routine clinical practice as well as psychotherapy research. We outline the forces that have determined the current corpus of outcome measures and contrast these with rational criteria for two levels of outcome batteries: a core battery, and problem-specific batteries. In addition, we identify potential referential measures that act as links between a core and problem-specific outcome batteries. Criteria are set out that a core battery should meet. Emphasis is given to two unique criteria: a collaborative approach to instrument development between researchers and clinicians, and the collection of a subsequent national database. Meeting such suggestions will benefit researchers promoting innovation in measurement practice. and clinicians as well as

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 202 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.