SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals
3 references·3 citing·17 second hop
Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals (2015)Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Acce…The Rise of Predatory Journals: What Difference Does It Make? (2015)The Rise of Predatory Journal…Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals (2014)Publish or Perish, and Pay—Th…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature (2023)Methodological Quality of Ope…The Price of Publishing: An Investigation of the Open Access Landscape in Plastic Surgery (2022)The Price of Publishing: An I…Navigating the Gray of Academic Publication (2021)Navigating the Gray of Academ…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals (2016)Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation (2016)Predatory publishing: A wake-up call for editors and authors in the Middle East and Africa (2017)Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (2014)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2014)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 2014Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals34 cited
  • 2015The Rise of Predatory Journals: What Difference Does It Make?18 cited

Cited by

  • 2022The Price of Publishing: An Investigation of the Open Access Landscape in Plastic Surgery8 cited
  • 2023Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature5 cited
  • 2021Navigating the Gray of Academic Publication5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work