SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Run, Jane, Run! Gendered Responses to Political Party Recruitment
16 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled
Run, Jane, Run! Gendered Responses to Political Party Recruitment (2015)Run, Jane, Run! Gendered Responses to Pol…Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion (2015)Why women don’t run: Experime…Electing Women of Color: The Role of Campaign Trainings (2015)Electing Women of Color: The …Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry (2014)Women Don't Run? Election Ave…More women can run: gender and pathways to the state legislatures (2014)More women can run: gender an…More Women Can Run (2013)More Women Can RunGendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation (2013)Gendered Recruitment without …It still takes a candidate: why women don't run for office (2011)It still takes a candidate: w…It Still Takes A Candidate (2010)It Still Takes A CandidateIf Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition (2010)If Only They’d Ask: Gender, R…Where women run: gender and party in the American states (2007)Where women run: gender and p…Where Women Run (2006)Where Women RunWhen to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House (2006)When to Risk It? Institutions…Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy (2006)Throwing Your Hat Out of the …Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment (2004)Threat as a Motivator of Poli…The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment (2000)The Effects of Canvassing, Te…Party Elites and Women Candidates (1998)Party Elites and Women Candid…Gendered Jobs and Local Leaders (2025)Gendered Jobs and Local Leade…Representation from Below: How Women’s Grassroots Party Activism Promotes Equal Political Participation (2023)Representation from Below: Ho…Descriptive Representation and Party Building: Evidence from Municipal Governments in Brazil (2023)Descriptive Representation an…Do voters punish ambitious women? Tracking a gendered backlash toward the 2020 democratic presidential contenders (2022)Do voters punish ambitious wo…A meta-analytic review of the gender difference in leadership aspirations (2022)A meta-analytic review of the…Who Enters Politics and Why? (2021)Who Enters Politics and Why?Mentoring the Next Generation of Women Candidates: A Field Experiment of State Legislators (2020)Mentoring the Next Generation…Ambitious Women: Gender and Voter Perceptions of Candidate Ambition (2020)Ambitious Women: Gender and V…The Local Determinants of Representation: Party Constituency Associations, Candidate Nomination and Gender (2019)The Local Determinants of Rep…Status Incongruity and Backlash against Female Legislators: How Legislative Speechmaking Benefits Men, but Harms Women (2019)Status Incongruity and Backla…Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections (2019)Do Voters Prefer Women Judges…Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment (2019)Do Local Party Chairs Think W…Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging? (2018)Narcissistic Women and Cash-S…Getting past the gender gap in political ambition (2018)Getting past the gender gap i…Women's authority in political decision-making groups (2016)Women's authority in politica…Power, Gender, and Group Discussion (2016)Power, Gender, and Group Disc…In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development (1982)Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. (1995)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy (2018)The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics (2018)What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of Sixty-Seven Factorial Survey Experiments (2021)Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. (1968)Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections (1982)Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86 (1989)A Gendered Pipeline? The Advancement of State Legislators to Congress in Five States (2008)Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries (2011)Ideological Moderates Won’t Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress (2014)Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates (1993)Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. (1999)Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning (2002)Prominent Role Models: High‐Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office (2018)The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics (2019)A Theory of the Calculus of Voting (1968)Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America (1993)Setting the Agenda (2005)The Authoritarian Dynamic (2005)Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment (2008)Rising Tide (2003)The Curious Feminist (2004)Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era (2004)Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics (2010)American Federalism: A View from the States. (1967)Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. (1984)Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. (1992)Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates (2009)Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office (2014)Opening Up the Black Box: Gender and Candidate Selection in a New Era (2016)The American Voter. By A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960. Pp. viii, 573. $8.50.) (1960)Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics (1996)Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? (2007)Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates (2013)Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All (2014)Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class (2016)The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations (2016)Gender, race, and political ambition: how intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office (2016)Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition (2014)Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2000The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment1,382 cited
  • 2010It Still Takes A Candidate479 cited
  • 2014Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry474 cited
  • 2010If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition358 cited
  • 2013Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation344 cited
  • 2011It still takes a candidate: why women don't run for office325 cited
  • 2006When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House274 cited
  • 1998Party Elites and Women Candidates262 cited
  • 2013More Women Can Run252 cited
  • 2006Where Women Run220 cited
  • 2004Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment207 cited
  • 2007Where women run: gender and party in the American states178 cited
  • 2015Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion161 cited
  • 2014More women can run: gender and pathways to the state legislatures140 cited
  • 2006Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

91 cited
  • 2015Electing Women of Color: The Role of Campaign Trainings82 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment121 cited
    • 2021Who Enters Politics and Why?99 cited
    • 2016Women's authority in political decision-making groups52 cited
    • 2018Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?51 cited
    • 2022A meta-analytic review of the gender difference in leadership aspirations51 cited
    • 2023Representation from Below: How Women’s Grassroots Party Activism Promotes Equal Political Participation51 cited
    • 2019Status Incongruity and Backlash against Female Legislators: How Legislative Speechmaking Benefits Men, but Harms Women39 cited
    • 2020Ambitious Women: Gender and Voter Perceptions of Candidate Ambition35 cited
    • 2016Power, Gender, and Group Discussion33 cited
    • 2019The Local Determinants of Representation: Party Constituency Associations, Candidate Nomination and Gender27 cited
    • 2018Getting past the gender gap in political ambition26 cited
    • 2023Descriptive Representation and Party Building: Evidence from Municipal Governments in Brazil22 cited
    • 2022Do voters punish ambitious women? Tracking a gendered backlash toward the 2020 democratic presidential contenders21 cited
    • 2019Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections20 cited
    • 2020Mentoring the Next Generation of Women Candidates: A Field Experiment of State Legislators20 cited
    • 2025Gendered Jobs and Local Leaders17 cited