Forensic Accounting And Auditing: Compared And Contrasted To Traditional Accounting And Auditing

Dahli Gray

81 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Journal of Business Education (AJBE)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Accounting and Financial Management Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection

Abstract

Forensic versus traditional accounting and auditing are compared and contrasted. Evidence gathering is detailed. Forensic science and fraud symptoms are explained. Criminalists, expert testimony and corporate governance are presented.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013The Impact of Forensic Accounting on Fraud Detection 2012Fraudulent Activities and Forensic Accounting Services of Banks in Port Harcourt, Nigeria 2018Exploring evidence to develop a nomenclature for forensic accounting 2013Corporate Governance and Forensic Accountants' Role : Global Regulatory Action Scenario 2023Forensic accounting research around the world 2022An exploration of accounting students’ attitudes toward integrating forensic accounting in accounting education 2014Forensic Accounting Technique : A Means of Successful Eradication of Corruption Through Fraud Prevention , Bribery Prevention and Embezzlement Prevention in Nigeria 2020Forensic accounting and financial crimes in Nigerian public sector

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.