SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Take-Over Requests for Automated Driving
0 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Take-Over Requests for Automated Driving (2015)Take-Over Requests for Automated DrivingDoes a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety (2022)Does a faster takeover necess…Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles (2021)Updating our understanding of…Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving (2020)Multimodal warning design for…Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving (2020)Effects of cognitive and visu…Automated Driving: A Literature Review of the Take over Request in Conditional Automation (2020)Automated Driving: A Literatu…Engaging in NDRTs affects drivers’ responses and glance patterns after silent automation failures (2019)Engaging in NDRTs affects dri…Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation (2018)Transitioning to manual drivi…Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study (2018)Situation awareness increases…Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality (2018)Get ready for automated drivi…Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving (2018)Effects of Non-Driving Relate…From Car-Driver-Handovers to Cooperative Interfaces: Visions for Driver–Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving (2017)From Car-Driver-Handovers to …Driver response times to auditory, visual, and tactile take-over requests: A simulator study with 101 participants (2017)Driver response times to audi…A Review of Non-driving-related Tasks Used in Studies on Automated Driving (2017)A Review of Non-driving-relat…How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving (2016)How much time do drivers need…Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat (2016)Comparing spatially static an…Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving (2015)Vibrotactile Displays: A Surv…“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? (2013)Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence (2014)Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (2015)Coming back into the loop: Drivers’ perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving (2017)How to Increase Automated Vehicles’ Acceptance through In-Vehicle Interaction Design: A Review (2021)Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement (2000)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009)Assessing Distraction Potential of Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays for Vehicle Drivers (2019)Beyond mere take-over requests: The effects of monitoring requests on driver attention, take-over performance, and acceptance (2019)Ironies of automation (1983)A critique of the SAE conditional driving automation definition, and analyses of options for improvement (2018)Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions (2018)A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Takeover Performance During Conditionally Automated Driving (2020)Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance (2004)Trust in Automation (2014)From road distraction to safe driving: Evaluating the effects of boredom and gamification on driving behaviour, physiological arousal, and subjective experience (2017)Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information (2019)DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data (2021)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non–Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality (2019)Effects of different non-driving-related-task display modes on drivers’ eye-movement patterns during take-over in an automated vehicle (2020)Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research (1988)Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later (2006)Effects of non-driving-related tasks on takeover performance in different takeover situations in conditionally automated driving (2019)Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving (2020)Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving (2020)Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement (1988)Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games (2008)The Concept of Flow (2014)Transport safety and human factors in the era of automation: What can transport modes learn from each other? (2020)Takeover performance evaluation using driving simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle (2014)Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving (2016)How does training effect users’ attitudes and skills needed for highly automated driving? (2019)A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Applications for Automated Driving: 2009–2020 (2021)Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for Human-robot Interaction: A Survey and Virtual Design Element Taxonomy (2023)Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop (2017)Modeling takeover time based on non-driving-related task attributes in highly automated driving (2020)The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers’ situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles (2022)How drowsiness and distraction can interfere with take-over performance: A systematic and meta-analysis review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving196 cited
  • 2018Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving179 cited
  • 2020Automated Driving: A Literature Review of the Take over Request in Conditional Automation154 cited
  • 2015Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving153 cited
  • 2016Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat145 cited
  • 2018Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation134 cited
  • 2020Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving129 cited
  • 2017From Car-Driver-Handovers to Cooperative Interfaces: Visions for Driver–Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving123 cited
  • 2018Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality120 cited
  • 2017A Review of Non-driving-related Tasks Used in Studies on Automated Driving112 cited
  • 2020Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving100 cited
  • 2017Driver response times to auditory, visual, and tactile take-over requests: A simulator study with 101 participants96 cited
  • 2018Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

95 cited
  • 2022Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety89 cited
  • 2019Engaging in NDRTs affects drivers’ responses and glance patterns after silent automation failures84 cited
  • 2021Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles82 cited