SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Multicenter Trials
2 references·7 citing·35 second hop
Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Multicenter Trials (1998)Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Multi…Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials (1995)Large-scale randomized eviden…Methodologic guidelines for reports of clinical trials. (1985)Methodologic guidelines for r…Assessing data quality and the variability of source data verification auditing methods in clinical research settings (2018)Assessing data quality and th…Applying probabilistic temporal and multisite data quality control methods to a public health mortality registry in Spain: a systematic approach to quality control of repositories (2016)Applying probabilistic tempor…Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors (2015)Research misconduct and data …Ongoing monitoring of data clustering in multicenter studies (2012)Ongoing monitoring of data cl…What can we learn from a decade of database audits? The Duke Clinical Research Institute experience, 1997—2006 (2009)What can we learn from a deca…ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992–2002 (2004)ORI findings of scientific mi…Statistical Quality Control in Clinical Trials (1999)Statistical Quality Control i…A Review of Inference Procedures for the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in the One-Way Random Effects Model (1986)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Screening for data clustering in multicenter studies: the residual intraclass correlation (2013)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory (1986)Reducing the costs of phase III cardiovascular clinical trials (2005)What is Truth? (1976)The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on Two Decades of Debate about Scientific Misconduct (2003)Ethical Considerations in the Interpretation and Communication of Clinical Trial Results (2007)Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors) (1987)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care (1995)A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. (2000)Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report (2005)CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES (1954)Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (1992)Control Chart Tests Based on Geometric Moving Averages (2000)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Criminalization of scientific misconduct (2018)Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education (2019)The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences (2019)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Evaluating quality-of-life measures for clinical trials in Germany (1991)Dovelopment of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique* (1997)Reporting the study populations of clinical trials (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials365 cited
  • 1985Methodologic guidelines for reports of clinical trials.124 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors84 cited
  • 2016Applying probabilistic temporal and multisite data quality control methods to a public health mortality registry in Spain: a systematic approach to quality control of repositories45 cited
  • 2018Assessing data quality and the variability of source data verification auditing methods in clinical research settings42 cited
  • 2009What can we learn from a decade of database audits? The Duke Clinical Research Institute experience, 1997—200640 cited
  • 2004ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992–200233 cited
  • 2012Ongoing monitoring of data clustering in multicenter studies32 cited
  • 1999Statistical Quality Control in Clinical Trials23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work