Strategies for Resolving Activity Scheduling Conflicts: An Empirical Analysis

Matthew J. Roorda · Eric J. Miller

34 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Transportation Planning and Optimization Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

This paper examines the use of data from a multiple instrument panel survey conducted in Toronto, Canada, to assess rules for activity rescheduling in response to scheduling conflicts. Two types of rules are considered in the analysis. First, the concept of activity precedence is defined and analyzed; and second, strategies for rescheduling of the activities are assessed. The intention of this analysis is to provide an empirical basis for enhancing the system of rules used in the prototype TASHA model of activity and travel scheduling.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006Changing the timing of activities in resolving Scheduling Conflicts 2009Activity Travel Planning and Rescheduling Behavior 2005Implementation of a model of dynamic activity-travel rescheduling decisions: an agent-based micro-simulation framework 2008Modeling activity conflict resolution strategies using scheduling process data 2020Recent Progress in Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling: Rising Data and Applicability 2009A multi-instrumented approach to observing the activity rescheduling decision process 2016An optimization approach to resolve activity scheduling conflicts in ADAPTS activity-based model 2008Analysis of Planning Decisions during the Activity-Scheduling Process

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.