Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study

9 references·1 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
2014Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis209 cited
2012Scientific misconduct is worryingly prevalent in the UK, shows BMJ survey24 cited

Cited by

2022Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work