SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ARRIVE and CONSORT guidelines: do they have a place in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia?
14 references·0 citing·37 second hop
ARRIVE and CONSORT guidelines: do they have a place in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia? (2015)ARRIVE and CONSORT guidelines: do they ha…Reporting guidelines: How can they be implemented by veterinary journals? (2015)Reporting guidelines: How can…Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies (2014)Issues and pitfalls in method…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines (2014)Basic statistical reporting f…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration (2010)The REFLECT Statement: Report…Improving the quality of reporting in veterinary journals: How far do we need to go with reporting guidelines? (2010)Improving the quality of repo…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (1995)Reporting Randomized Controll…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties (2018)Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology (2018)Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety (2009)The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety by Modifying the CONSORT Statement (2010)Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)The CONSORT statement (2019)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2014Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines657 cited
  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2010The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration97 cited
  • 1995Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials81 cited
  • 2014Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies26 cited
  • 2010Improving the quality of reporting in veterinary journals: How far do we need to go with reporting guidelines?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2015Reporting guidelines: How can they be implemented by veterinary journals?7 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.