Article1993

Reliability of psychiatric and psychological diagnoses of mental retardation severity: judgments under naturally occurring conditions.

5 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Behavioral and Psychological Studies Down syndrome and intellectual disability research

Abstract

The reliability of diagnoses of mental retardation severity was examined through the comparison of psychiatric and psychological case reports found in client records. For a sample of 126 dually diagnosed clients, overall chance-corrected agreement was .47, ranging from .38 (for diagnoses of moderate mental retardation) to .55 (for diagnoses of borderline mental retardation). Results showed that the analysis of naturally occurring variation in diagnostic practices (including variability in professional judgment and assessment methods) may offer a more realistic appraisal of the reliability of diagnostic decisions in professional practice situations than do studies in which important sources of diagnostic error are controlled.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.