SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Managing database overlap in systematic reviews using Batch Citation Matcher: case studies using Scopus.
5 references·3 citing·35 second hop
Managing database overlap in systematic reviews using Batch Citation Matcher: case studies using Scopus. (2006)Managing database overlap in systematic r…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic reviews need syste…Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review (2004)Evaluation of methodological …Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system (2003)Literature searching for clin…BEYOND MEDLINE (2003)BEYOND MEDLINEDoes the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Boosting qualifies capture–recapture methods for estimating the comprehensiveness of literature searches for systematic reviews (2011)Boosting qualifies capture–re…Conducting Efficient Literature Searches: Strategies for Mental Health Nurses (2009)Conducting Efficient Literatu…Sources of evidence to support systematic reviews in librarianship (2008)Sources of evidence to suppor…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors (2012)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? (2015)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Synthesizing Qualitative Research (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Circular Economy Business Model in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review (2024)The Cochrane Library (2005)Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort (2009)Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine (2013)Capture-mark-recapture to estimate the number of missed articles for systematic reviews in surgery (2013)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ (1996)Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. (1998)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Model Transparency and Validation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Semi‐automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency (2009)Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
  • 2004Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review202 cited
  • 2003Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system194 cited
  • 2003BEYOND MEDLINE105 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Boosting qualifies capture–recapture methods for estimating the comprehensiveness of literature searches for systematic reviews13 cited
  • 2009Conducting Efficient Literature Searches: Strategies for Mental Health Nurses12 cited
  • 2008Sources of evidence to support systematic reviews in librarianship10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work