Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement

15 references·9 citing·35 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses881 cited
2013Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?146 cited
2013Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature112 cited
2012A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics105 cited
2013Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality81 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015

Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement

55 cited

2015Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of ‘instructions to authors’53 cited

2012The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: A systematic review45 cited

Cited by

2016Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals25 cited
2017Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement20 cited
2018Systematic overview and critical appraisal of meta‐analyses of interventions in intensive care medicine19 cited
2019Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study19 cited
2022Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study12 cited
2019Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines11 cited
2023Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery11 cited
2019Common Fallacies in Designing a Research Project: Guidance Principles10 cited
2017Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology10 cited