SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort
8 references·6 citing·41 second hop
Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort (2015)Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR H…Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection (2014)Ability of a meta-analysis to…The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials (2013)The use of systematic reviews…Many reports of randomised trials still don’t begin or end with a systematic review of the relevant evidence (2013)Many reports of randomised tr…Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials (2010)Empirical assessment suggests…Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)Clinical trials should begin …Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research (2009)Evidence synthesis as the key…The use of systematic reviews when designing studies (2005)The use of systematic reviews…Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old (2004)Doing New Research? Don't For…How to improve the study design of clinical trials in internal medicine: recent advances in the evidence‑based methodology (2021)How to improve the study desi…Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials (2021)Barriers and Facilitating Fac…Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions (2019)Synthesizing existing evidenc…Use of a random effects meta‐analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial (2018)Use of a random effects meta‐…The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials (2017)The INVEST project: investiga…All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review (2016)All health researchers should…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Using conditional power of network meta‐analysis (NMA) to inform the design of future clinical trials (2014)How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis (2015)Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination (2015)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of Health Care and Services Using Systematic Reviews of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it (2017)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence (2010)Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot assess the impact of additional evidence on a meta-analysis (2012)Trial sequential methods for meta‐analysis (2013)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (2016)Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review (2022)Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1998)Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses (2007)Using the bayesmeta R package for Bayesian random-effects meta-regression (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)What is a ‘complex systematic review’? Criteria, definition, and examples (2018)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research (2015)An assessment of the informativeness of clinical trials in digital mental health (2025)The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols (2016)Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting166 cited
  • 2004Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old101 cited
  • 2005The use of systematic reviews when designing studies97 cited
  • 2009Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research94 cited
  • 2013The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials72 cited
  • 2010Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials63 cited
  • 2014Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection58 cited
  • 2013Many reports of randomised trials still don’t begin or end with a systematic review of the relevant evidence24 cited

Cited by

  • 2016All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review22 cited
  • 2021Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials21 cited
  • 2017The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials21 cited
  • 2018Use of a random effects meta‐analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial18 cited
  • 2021How to improve the study design of clinical trials in internal medicine: recent advances in the evidence‑based methodology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 2019Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions12 cited