Hypothesis Bound: Trial and Error in the Nineteenth Century

Abstract

Like so many things, "trial and error" has a history. The term first emerged as the name for a technique in eighteenth-century mathematics pedagogy. In the nineteenth century, psychologists and biologists transformed "trial and error" from a mathematical tool into a developmental theory, one that could explain both the learning mind and life on earth. "Trial and error" can thus be seen as a case of the larger process whereby the tools we use to explain the world do not just influence but in many ways become our explanations--a process that the psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer has called the "tools-to-theories" heuristic. This essay uses Gigerenzer's concept to frame the evolution of "trial and error." By the end, it suggests how the historical relationship between tools and theories prompts a reconsideration of the terms and assumptions historians of science use in their own work.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.