SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery: Strategies to Improve Quantity and Quality
4 references·1 citing·21 second hop
Randomized Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery: Strategies to Improve Quantity and Quality (2010)Randomized Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic…INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENC…THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF R…Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Many faces of the minimal cli…When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. (1997)When and how to assess fast-c…Randomized Trials in Surgery: How Far Have We Come? (2012)Randomized Trials in Surgery:…The diffusion of innovations (1983)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1996)The Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices (2013)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The quality of randomised controlled trials involving surgery from the hand to the elbow (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review (2007)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)Measurement of health status (1989)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference (2009)Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life—a systematic review (2017)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)How Effective is Cultural Competence Training of Healthcare Providers on Improving Patient Satisfaction of Minority Groups? A Systematic Review of Literature (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
  • 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research514 cited
  • 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
  • 1997When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies.112 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Randomized Trials in Surgery: How Far Have We Come?20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work