SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CONSORT for TCM) (For Solicitation of Comments)
6 references·3 citing·35 second hop
Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CONSORT for TCM) (For Solicitation of Comments) (2007)Consolidated Standards for Reporting Tria…The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China (2007)The Quality of Reporting of R…Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement (2006)Reporting Randomized, Control…Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅳ: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality (2006)Improving the quality of rand…Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅰ: clinical trial design and methodology (2006)Improving the quality of rand…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines (2019)Reporting quality of Cochrane…Quality of reporting of two-group parallel randomized controlled clinical trials of multi-herb formulae: A survey of reports indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2011)Quality of reporting of two-g…Improving the quality of reporting acupuncture interventions: describing the collaboration between STRICTA, CONSORT and the Chinese Cochrane Centre (2009)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture (2012)STRICTA: is it time to do more? (2015)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials that Examine the Efficacy of Natural Health Products: A Systematic Review of Critical Appraisal Instruments (2007)Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in coloproctology: interpretation and potential pitfalls (2007)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language (2021)Chinese herbal medicine for insomnia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2012)Trends in Scientific Publications of Chinese Medicine (2012)An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China (2008)Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional chinese medicine RCTs: A review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews (2011)Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2006Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement606 cited
  • 2007The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China140 cited
  • 2006Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅰ: clinical trial design and methodology50 cited
  • 2006Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅳ: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality35 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Improving the quality of reporting acupuncture interventions: describing the collaboration between STRICTA, CONSORT and the Chinese Cochrane Centre21 cited
  • 2019Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines18 cited
  • 2011Quality of reporting of two-group parallel randomized controlled clinical trials of multi-herb formulae: A survey of reports indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work