A SYSTEMATIC QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF FIVE APPROACHES TO MODULARITY

Fredrik Börjesson

12 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Product Development and Customization Design Education and Practice Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

Abstract

An approach to modularity is used to mean the method by which a modular architecture is defined. This paper presents a method by which such approaches can be compared, incorporating both academic and experience-based criteria. The proposed method, based on dendrograms, is applied on MFD, Component-based DSM, Heuristics, and two derived approaches. Derived approaches seem to offer improvements, but also introduce new disadvantages which are absent in the methods on which they build.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

2018PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 2004Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 1998A Heuristic Method to Identify Modules From a Functional Description of a Product 1999Identifying Product Portfolio Architecture Modularity Using Function and Variety Heuristics 2005Modular product platform design

Cited by

2014Modularization vs. Innovation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.