SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An initiative to facilitate well-informed decision-making in laboratory animal research: report of the First International Symposium on Systematic Reviews in Laboratory Animal Science
3 references·0 citing·15 second hop
An initiative to facilitate well-informed decision-making in laboratory animal research: report of the First International Symposium on Systematic Reviews in Laboratory Animal Science (2012)An initiative to facilitate well-informed…Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy (2010)Publication Bias in Reports o…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide (2013)Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists (2017)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2010Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy600 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work