Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is There Truly “No Significant Difference”?

6 references·4 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
2003Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life4,692 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,019 cited
2005Is This Clinical Trial Fully Registered? — A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors354 cited
2013An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria77 cited

Cited by

2022Guidelines for Proper Reporting of Clinical Significance, Including Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Maximal Outcome Improvement75 cited
2020Revisiting the Sample Size and Statistical Power of Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthopaedics After 2 Decades28 cited
2020Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Surgery18 cited
2019Fragility Index, power, strength and robustness of findings in sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery: a secondary analysis of data from a study on use of the Fragility Index in sports surgery16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work