SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness
0 references·7 citing·25 second hop
Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness (2012)Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source o…Case studies to explore the optimal use of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses that use GRADE (2022)Case studies to explore the o…ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY OF REPORTING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN A SAMPLE OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES (2022)ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY O…From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials (2019)From registration to publicat…Selective outcome reporting is present in randomized controlled trials in lung cancer immunotherapies (2018)Selective outcome reporting i…Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses (2016)Value and usability of unpubl…Using ClinicalTrials.gov to Supplement Information in Ophthalmology Conference Abstracts about Trial Outcomes: A Comparison Study (2015)Using ClinicalTrials.gov to S…Clinical trial registries are of minimal use for identifying selective outcome and analysis reporting (2014)Clinical trial registries are…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)A Narrative Review and Proposed Framework for Using Health System Data with Systematic Reviews to Support Decision-making (2020)Supplementary databases increased literature search coverage beyond PubMed and Embase (2025)Reducing Publication Bias Through Trial Registration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Outcome Reporting bias in Exercise Oncology trials (OREO): a cross-sectional study (2021)Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (2022)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study (2022)Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study (2023)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)THE USAGE AND REPORTING OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AMONG SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN ORTHODONTICS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses23 cited
  • 2019From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials21 cited
  • 2022ASSESSMENT OF THE FREQUENCY OF REPORTING DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (dPROs) IN A SAMPLE OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS ON ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES17 cited
  • 2018Selective outcome reporting is present in randomized controlled trials in lung cancer immunotherapies14 cited
  • 2015Using ClinicalTrials.gov to Supplement Information in Ophthalmology Conference Abstracts about Trial Outcomes: A Comparison Study14 cited
  • 2014Clinical trial registries are of minimal use for identifying selective outcome and analysis reporting12 cited
  • 2022Case studies to explore the optimal use of randomized and nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses that use GRADE11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work