Indivisible Human Rights

Daniel J. Whelan

137 citations0/0 files storedUniversity of Pennsylvania Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics International Law and Human Rights Legal Rights and Human Rights

Abstract

Daniel Whelan illustrates how the rhetoric of indivisibility has frequently been used to further political ends that have little to do with protecting the rights of the individual. Drawing on scores of original documents, he reveals the conflicts and compromises behind a half century of human rights discourse.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 137 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019What is the responsibility to respect human rights? Reconsidering the ‘respect, protect, and fulfill’ framework 2012Substance, Scale, and Salience: The Recent Historiography of Human Rights 2012Some Rights Are More Equal than Others: The Third World and the Transformation of Economic and Social Rights 2018THE INDIVISIBILITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 2021The inflation of human rights: A deconstruction 2014Human Rights Trade-Offs in a Context of “Systemic Lack of Freedom”: The Case of the Smelter Town of La Oroya, Peru 2015The Cold War and the rise of an American conception of human rights, 1945–8 2020Revisiting interdependence in times and terms of crisis

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.