Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning.

Gwilym Lockwood · Mark Dingemanse · Peter Hagoort A

90 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Categorization, perception, and language Phonetics and Phonology Research Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Abstract

The existence of sound-symbolism (or a non-arbitrary link between form and meaning) is well-attested. However, sound-symbolism has mostly been investigated with nonwords in forced choice tasks, neither of which are representative of natural language. This study uses ideophones, which are naturally occurring sound-symbolic words that depict sensory information, to investigate how sensitive Dutch speakers are to sound-symbolism in Japanese in a learning task. Participants were taught 2 sets of Japanese ideophones; 1 set with the ideophones' real meanings in Dutch, the other set with their opposite meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned the ideophones and their real meanings much better than the ideophones with their opposite meanings. Moreover, despite the learning rounds, participants were still able to guess the real meanings of the ideophones in a 2-alternative forced-choice test after they were informed of the manipulation. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is robust beyond 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms and affects broader language processes such as word learning. In Experiment 2, participants learned regular Japanese adjectives with the same manipulation, and there was no difference between real and opposite conditions. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is especially strong in ideophones, and that people learn words better when form and meaning match. The highlights of this study are as follows: (a) Dutch speakers learn real meanings of Japanese ideophones better than opposite meanings, (b) Dutch speakers accurately guess meanings of Japanese ideophones, (c) this sensitivity happens despite learning some opposite pairings, (d) no such learning effect exists for regular Japanese adjectives, and (e) this shows the importance of sound-symbolism in scaffolding language learning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

References

2010The weirdest people in the world?2001Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language 1929A study in phonetic symbolism.1970Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology 2015Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language 2010Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages 2012Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones 2014The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution

Cited by

2017Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning 2021Sound symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns 2019Semantic Associations Dominate Over Perceptual Associations in Vowel–Size Iconicity 2019A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development 2017A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.