Philosophers of science increasingly recognize the importance of idealization: the intentional introduction of distortion into scientific theories. Yet this recognition has not yielded consensus about the nature of idealization. Thee literature of the past thirty years contains disparate characterizations and justifications, but little evidence of convergence towards a common position.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 623 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.