SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Analysis of Medical Laboratory Technology Journals’ Instructions for Authors
11 references·4 citing·51 second hop
An Analysis of Medical Laboratory Technology Journals’ Instructions for Authors (2015)An Analysis of Medical Laboratory Technol…CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update (2016)CSE’s White Paper on Promotin…Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals (2014)Upgrading instructions for au…EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific Articles to be Published in English (2014)EASE Guidelines for Authors a…Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Misconduct Policies in High-I…Responsible writing in science (2010)Responsible writing in scienceEditorial Policies of Pediatric Journals (2010)Editorial Policies of Pediatr…Committee on publication ethics (2010)Committee on publication ethi…Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? (2007)Do medical journals provide c…The Content of Medical Journal Instructions for Authors (2006)The Content of Medical Journa…Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. (2003)Emerging ethical issues in in…International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)International Committee of Me…The Ethics of Online Controlled Experiments (A/B Testing) (2023)The Ethics of Online Controll…Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Current Standards and Recommendations for Future Practice (2018)Reporting in Experimental Phi…Guidance Provided to Authors on Citing and Formatting References in Nursing Journals (2018)Guidance Provided to Authors …A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy (2017)A plea for minimally biased n…The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors (2005)Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors (2012)Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines (2012)Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 1 (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of ‘instructions to authors’ (2015)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines (2019)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context (2016)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing (2007)The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies (2009)Role of the journal editor in sustaining integrity in research (1993)The present state of medical journals (1998)Guidelines on good publication practice (2001)Revistas brasileiras publicadoras de artigos científicos em cirurgia. III: análise das instruções aos autores baseada na estrutura dos requisitos de Vancouver (2007)Ethical issues in instructions to authors of journals in oral-craniomaxillofacial/facial plastic surgery and related specialities (2010)Survey of “instructions to authors” of Indian medical journals for reporting of ethics and authorship criteria (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy (2016)Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers (2016)Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing (2006)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Author attitudes to professional medical writing support (2014)Hiring a professional medical writer: is it equivalent to ghostwriting? (2014)Ten Tips for Authors of Scientific Articles (2014)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)The CONSORT Statement (1996)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Drawing a line: Setting guidelines for digital image processing in scientific journal articles (2012)Plagiarism in articles published in journals indexed in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL): a comparative analysis between 2013 and 2018 (2021)Standardizing terminology for text recycling in research writing (2021)Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-use? (2009)Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.415 cited
  • 2010Committee on publication ethics201 cited
  • 2012Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals108 cited
  • 2007Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?100 cited
  • 2006The Content of Medical Journal Instructions for Authors73 cited
  • 2010Editorial Policies of Pediatric Journals64 cited
  • 2016CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update41 cited
  • 2003Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals.32 cited
  • 2014EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific Articles to be Published in English30 cited
  • 2014Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals30 cited
  • 2010Responsible writing in science13 cited

Cited by

  • 2023The Ethics of Online Controlled Experiments (A/B Testing)18 cited
  • 2018Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Current Standards and Recommendations for Future Practice11 cited
  • 2018Guidance Provided to Authors on Citing and Formatting References in Nursing Journals8 cited
  • 2017A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited