No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The emergence of international criminal law as a new specialist regime has reinvigorated concerns relating to 'fragmentation'. This chapter treats 'fragmentation' as a symptom, and looks at the implications of this symptom in a specific discipline - international criminal law. It is thus a priori 'neutral' in its observational standpoint, and focused on identification of the impact and verification of the paradigm in the specific field of international criminal justice. The chapter investigates conflicts between rules of general public international law and international criminal law as well as conflicts between different layers and constituencies inside the domain of international criminal law. In doing so, it examines different forms of 'differentiation', and consequences of the 'fragmentation' debate in this field. The chapter addresses procedural implications. The diversification of international law and its judicial fora requires a deeper engagement with legal pluralism, and the symbiotic interaction of criminal justice and human rights. Keywords:diversification; fragmentation; human rights; international criminal justice; international criminal law; legal pluralism
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.