References

• 1993Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds26,615 cited
• 2002Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations21,666 cited
• 1964CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*19,431 cited
• 1997On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance17,267 cited
• 1992The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns17,251 cited
• 1973Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests14,248 cited
• 1993Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency11,575 cited
• 2002Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects10,008 cited
• 1965The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets7,600 cited
• 1975THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.]