Implications of the use of different payment models

Felix Villalba-Romero · Champika Liyanage

26 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public-Private Partnership Projects Transport and Economic Policies Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the payment models and financing structures used for road Infrastructure projects under public private partnerships (PPPs) in the UK. Comparison of funding and financial structures in the selected case studies exposes the risks and values of the models of payment utilised. This research also aims to identify relationships with payment certainty and financing debt restructuring. Design/methodology/approach – The paper compares several case studies representing the evolution of private finance initiative road infrastructure in the UK context. Templates were completed using semi- structured interviews during data collection; and a qualitative content analysis approach was employed for case study analysis. Findings – Lessons learned from using different payment methods show the benefit and limitations of adopting different forms of PPP in road development. Refinancing of projects presents substantial risks to the viability of a project, and benefits gained by the private sector. Further, refinancing brings no significant benefits to the public sector as well. Practical implications – Performance of selected case studies highlights emerging issues that need to be considered when adopting a PPP procurement route in roads projects. Financial markets have supported these projects under different risk profiles and payment models. They also have the potential to play a greater part in capitalising long-term investment in road projects and increase private sector participation in infrastructure development, generating more competition and innovation. Originality/value – This paper provides case study comparison and practical implications of recent PPP developments in road provision in the UK and the evolution of public policy in the subject.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research 1997Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay 2004The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK 2002Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research 2005Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry 2004Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development 2003Public Private Partnerships: Managing Risks and Opportunities 2002Public–private partnerships: lessons from the British approach

Cited by

2018TWO DECADES OF DBFO ROADS IN THE UK AND SPAIN: AN EVALUATION OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2019Determining critical risk factors affecting public‐private partnership waste‐to‐energy incineration projects in China 2019An evaluation of the impact of risk cost on risk allocation in public private partnership projects 2017The influence of risk on the equity share of build-operate-transfer projects 2017Risk factors influencing the debt leverage of project financing initiatives in the energy industry

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.