No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Low- and middle-income countries face difficult decisions about which health care interventions are worthwhile given existing constraints on health care expenditure. Decisions require some assessment of the health opportunity costs of proposed investments, i.e. a cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) that represents the likely health effects of changes in health care expenditure. This paper provides a framework for generating country-level CETs using existing published estimates of the mortality effect of health expenditure. The results suggest that CETs representing likely health opportunity costs tend to be below the lower bound suggested by WHO of 1x GDP per capita. Hence, many previous and existing recommendations about which interventions are cost-effective that are based on the WHO threshold are likely to do more harm than good.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.