Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Hartung–Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed‐effect meta‐analysis

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,401 cited
2003Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate2,068 cited
2015Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis1,677 cited
2008Meta-Regression in Stata896 cited
2001A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome764 cited
2001On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta‐analysis with normally distributed responses533 cited
2014Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change452 cited
2002A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis424 cited
2006Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis397 cited
1999Random-Effects Meta-Analyses Are Not Always Conservative338 cited
1999An Alternative Method for Meta-Analysis211 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006

meta: General Package for Meta-Analysis

202 cited

2011Detecting and adjusting for small‐study effects in meta‐analysis132 cited

Cited by

2023Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation76 cited
2018Multistep estimators of the between‐study variance: The relationship with the Paule‐Mandel estimator48 cited
2021Six Meta-analyses on Treatments for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in a Year and Readers Are None the Wiser: Methods Advice for Researchers Planning Meta-analysis of Data From Fewer Than 5 Trials41 cited
2021Digital Interventions for People With Co-Occurring Depression and Problematic Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis39 cited
2016Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?35 cited
2021Performing Meta-analyses with Very Few Studies34 cited
2021Study specific prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis: A tutorial29 cited
2020Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random‐effects meta‐analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods24 cited
2021Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals—A methodological study24 cited
2022Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies19 cited
2023Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis18 cited
2021Material Scarcity and Unethical Economic Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis16 cited
2024Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study14 cited
2024Most meta-analyses in oral health do not have conclusive and robust results10 cited
2023A case study evaluating the effect of clustering, publication bias, and heterogeneity on the meta‐analysis estimates in implant dentistry7 cited
2023Do pooled estimates from orthodontic meta-analyses change depending on the meta-analysis approach? A meta-epidemiological study6 cited