Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer.

4 references·4 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.1,581 cited
1991Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Node-Negative Breast Cancer237 cited
1991Cost Effectiveness of Prophylactic Intravenous Immune Globulin in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia204 cited
1992Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Metastatic Breast Cancer139 cited

Cited by

2010A Review and Meta-Analysis of Utility Values for Lung Cancer78 cited
2002Economic Analysis of Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Versus Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer74 cited
2002Economic Analysis of the TAX 317 Trial: Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care as Second-Line Therapy of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer71 cited
1998Economic issues in lung cancer: a review.70 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work