SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers
4 references·12 citing·41 second hop
Scientometric analysis: A technical need for medical science researchers either as authors or as peer reviewers (2016)Scientometric analysis: A technical need …The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles (2013)The Importance of Proper Cita…Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)Plagiarism in Scientific Publ…Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures (2011)Finding a Way Through the Sci…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Scholarly trends in global orthopedics research published through the journal of orthopaedics: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2024 (2024)Scholarly trends in global or…Deciphering the past status and future tendency: a comprehensive scientometric study on developmental dysplasia of the hip (2024)Deciphering the past status a…International Orthopaedics journal: A bibliometric analysis during 1977-2022 (2023)International Orthopaedics jo…Scientometrics: The Imperative for Scientific Validity of the Scientific Publications Content (2022)Scientometrics: The Imperativ…Predatory Journals and Publishers - Dilemmas: How to Assess it and How to Avoid it? (2021)Predatory Journals and Publis…Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Pubmed Indexed Medical Journals Published in Former Yugoslav Countries (2020)Comparative Analysis of Web o…Bibliometric synthesis of educational productivity research: Benchmarking the visibility of German educational research (2019)Bibliometric synthesis of edu…Improving peer review: What reviewers can do (2017)Improving peer review: What r…Scientometric Dilemma: Is H-index Adequate for Scientific Validity of Academic's Work? (2016)Scientometric Dilemma: Is H-i…Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Validity of Medical Archives Regarding Other Medical Journals in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2016)Scientometric Analysis of Sci…Peer Review - Essential For Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity (2016)Peer Review - Essential For A…H-index and How to Improve it? (2016)H-index and How to Improve it?Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Gender Differences in the Publication Rate Among Breast Imaging Radiologists in the United States and Canada (2017)Bibliometrics in a Digital Age: Help or Hindrance (2018)Fifteen years of e-government research in Ibero-America: A bibliometric analysis (2019)How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2011)Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals (2014)Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)The state of h index research (2008)Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries (2020)Inflated Co-authorship Introduces Bias to Current Scientometric Indices (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review? (2017)Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research (2019)Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields (2020)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Committee on publication ethics (2010)Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review (2011)Predatory Open Access Journals are Indexed in Reputable Databases: a Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Improving peer review: What journals can do (2017)Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review (2023)Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)The game of academic publishing: a review of gamified publication practices in the social sciences (2024)Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It (2014)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences (2021)Breaking free from academic scams: Five key reflections on the cloned journal conundrum (2023)An overview of studies assessing predatory journals within the biomedical sciences (2025)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The First Mediterranean Seminar on Science Writing, Editing and Publishing, Sarajevo, December 2-3, 2016 (2016)A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Neurocritical Care Research (2019)A Bibliometric Study of the Most Cited Reports in Central Nervous System Arteriovenous Malformations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2012Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing147 cited
  • 2011Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures108 cited
  • 2013The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles81 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Scientometric Dilemma: Is H-index Adequate for Scientific Validity of Academic's Work?44 cited
  • 2017Improving peer review: What reviewers can do29 cited
  • 2016Peer Review - Essential For Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity28 cited
  • 2021Predatory Journals and Publishers - Dilemmas: How to Assess it and How to Avoid it?15 cited
  • 2016Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Validity of Medical Archives Regarding Other Medical Journals in Bosnia and Herzegovina15 cited
  • 2019Bibliometric synthesis of educational productivity research: Benchmarking the visibility of German educational research15 cited
  • 2016H-index and How to Improve it?13 cited
  • 2022Scientometrics: The Imperative for Scientific Validity of the Scientific Publications Content11 cited
  • 2023International Orthopaedics journal: A bibliometric analysis during 1977-202211 cited
  • 2020Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Pubmed Indexed Medical Journals Published in Former Yugoslav Countries

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2024Scholarly trends in global orthopedics research published through the journal of orthopaedics: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 202410 cited
  • 2024Deciphering the past status and future tendency: a comprehensive scientometric study on developmental dysplasia of the hip9 cited