this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
- 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
- 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
- 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
- 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
- 2013RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews611 cited
- 2012What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review345 cited
- 2013Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute292 cited
- 1998Shifting Images of Chronic Illness211 cited
- 2011A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews168 cited
- 2016A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method159 cited
- 2016Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence103 cited
- 2013Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal86 cited
- 2006
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work