SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
16 references·5 citing·46 second hop
Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study (2016)Professional medical writing support and …The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors (2015)The most important tasks for …Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review (2015)Authors report lack of time a…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)Impact of peer review on repo…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in…Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Impact of allocation concealm…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (1996)Readers' evaluation of effect…AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement on medical publications, preprints, and peer review (2021)AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint positio…Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives (2020)Hype in reports of clinical r…AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP Joint Position Statement on the Role of Professional Medical Writers (2017)AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP Joint Positio…Improved Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urologic Literature (2016)Improved Reporting of Randomi…Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer-reviewed publications (2016)Factors impacting time to acc…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
  • 2015Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

175 cited
  • 2014Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study103 cited
  • 1996Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde84 cited
  • 2015The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors62 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives38 cited
    • 2016Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer-reviewed publications28 cited
    • 2021AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement on medical publications, preprints, and peer review22 cited
    • 2016Improved Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urologic Literature21 cited
    • 2017AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP Joint Position Statement on the Role of Professional Medical Writers18 cited