SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A study exploring attributes and nature of the retracted literature on mental disorders
16 references·0 citing·29 second hop
A study exploring attributes and nature of the retracted literature on mental disorders (2015)A study exploring attributes and nature o…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? (2011)Retractions in the medical li…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct (2009)Analysis of Citations to Biom…Retraction rates are on the rise (2008)Retraction rates are on the r…Repairing research integrity (2008)Repairing research integrityEmpirical developments in retraction (2008)Empirical developments in ret…How many scientific papers should be retracted? (2007)How many scientific papers sh…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. (2006)Comparison of top-performing …Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionCheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (2001)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship Fails (1997)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Scientific Utopia (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,922 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,236 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?408 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature362 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2008Repairing research integrity300 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?216 cited
  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 2011Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?156 cited
  • 2008Retraction rates are on the rise149 cited
  • 2006Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE.114 cited
  • 2007How many scientific papers should be retracted?113 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008
Empirical developments in retraction
91 cited
  • 2009Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct66 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.