Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Privacy, surveillance, and the proportionality principle: The need for a method of assessing privacy implications of technologies used for surveillance

16 references·2 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002What's New About the "New Surveillance"? Classifying for Change and Continuity.343 cited
1993The European System for The Protection of Human Rights338 cited
2012Proportionality326 cited
2002The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR312 cited
2010The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law270 cited
2011Security and Privacy : Global Standards for Ethical Identity Management in Contemporary Liberal Democratic States209 cited
2009Privacy impact assessment: Its origins and development196 cited
1998Ethics for the New Surveillance159 cited
1999The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe143 cited
19992. Ethics for the New Surveillance106 cited
2012The state of the art in privacy impact assessment95 cited
2014Privacy principles, risks and harms84 cited
2011A Human Rights Perspective on Privacy and Data Protection Impact Assessments80 cited
2010Sorting out smart surveillance42 cited
2013A Comparative Analysis of Privacy Impact Assessment in Six Countries37 cited
1993

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Principle of Proportionality in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights

22 cited

Cited by

2019Outsourcing the Welfare State: The Role of Private Actors in Welfare Fraud Investigations57 cited
2021“Just” Algorithms: Justification (Beyond Explanation) of Automated Decisions Under the General Data Protection Regulation10 cited