SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses · Study

ReviewPublication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Paul Atakpo2016

Review2016

Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Paul Atakpo · Matt B. Vassar

52 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Dermatological Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis 1991Publication bias in clinical research 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis 2007H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1.2007The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey

Cited by

2016Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews 2017Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool 2017Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross‐sectional review 2017Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020A historical review of publication biasreview · 7 shared references 2014Meta-analysis selection bias in marketing researcharticle · 7 shared references 2016Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviewsreview · 7 shared references 2019Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysisarticle · 6 shared references 2020Recommendations for Reviewing Meta-Analyses in Organizational Researcharticle · 6 shared references 2022Assessing Publication Bias: a 7-Step User’s Guide with Best-Practice Recommendationsarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typereview

Published2016-02-25

VenueJournal of Dermatological Science

ISSN-L0923-1811

Languageen

Citations52

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.02.005

openalex_workW2287642010

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2019An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature

2019Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals

2021Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid

2020Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review