SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record
2 references·8 citing·42 second hop
When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record (2015)When things go wrong: correcting the scie…The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries (2012)The persistence of error: a s…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Is gold open access helpful for academic purification? A causal inference analysis based on retracted articles in biochemistry (2024)Is gold open access helpful f…Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct (2023)Enhancing Partnerships of Ins…Amending the literature through version control (2023)Amending the literature throu…Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice (2021)Cooperation & Liaison between…Self‐correction prevents withdrawal syndrome (2019)Self‐correction prevents with…Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error (2017)Doing the Right Thing: A Qual…Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers (2016)Statement on Publication Ethi…Legends in Science: from Boom to Bust (2016)Legends in Science: from Boom…The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations (1975)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)What Studies of Retractions Tell Us (2014)Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)From Paper to Practice; Indexing Systems and Ethical Standards (2017)Definition of authorship in social science journals (2018)Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review (2022)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)What Rights Do Authors Have? (2016)A new dimension in publishing ethics: social media-based ethics-related accusations (2019)Does the culture of science publishing need to change from the status quo principle of “trust me”? (2022)The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)A theory of justice original edition (1971)An Introduction to Reasoning (1980)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)An analysis of retractions of dental publications (2018)Fallibility in Science: Responding to Errors in the Work of Oneself and Others (2018)Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes (2022)Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections (2018)Publish peer reviews (2018)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Australian code for the responsible conduct of research (2018)Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions? (2023)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Implementing Code Review in the Scientific Workflow: Insights from Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (2023)Correcting the Medical Literature: “To Err Is Human, to Correct Divine” (2017)Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania (1993)What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters (1997)Do Changes in Journal Rank Influence Publication Output? Evidence from China (2024)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2012The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries74 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error52 cited
  • 2016Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers42 cited
  • 2021Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice40 cited
  • 2024Is gold open access helpful for academic purification? A causal inference analysis based on retracted articles in biochemistry13 cited
  • 2023Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct13 cited
  • 2016Legends in Science: from Boom to Bust11 cited
  • 2019Self‐correction prevents withdrawal syndrome7 cited
  • 2023Amending the literature through version control6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work