Liberal Nationalism versus Cosmopolitanism: Locating the Disputes

Abstract

nationalists and cosmopolitans appear to be engaged in a debate.1 From the evidence, however, it is not clear both sides always understand exactly what is at issue. This paper clarifies some of the points of difference and agreement so that more progress can be made in resolving the issues. It discusses some possible ways to resolve disagreements and reconcile the two views. It suggests that cosmopolitanism should be preferred, though it concedes that liberal nationalism may have some merit as an interim goal in certain situations. Section 1 covers the liberal nationalist's position by considering the starting assumptions and motivating concerns, the arguments offered as the moral basis for the position, and the problems liberal nationalists face. Section 2 covers the same for the cosmopolitan's position. Section 3 locates some of the points of agreement and disagreement between the two sides. Section 4 discusses some possible ways to reconcile the two positions. Section 5 summarizes where we are in the debate and what tasks remain pressing for both sides.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.