Streeter's ‘Other’ Synoptic Solution: The Matthew Conflator Hypothesis

Alan Garrow

16 citations0/0 files storedNew Testament Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Studies and Philology Historical and Linguistic Studies

Abstract

B. H. Streeter'sFour Gospelshas had a critical influence on the study of the Synoptic Problem. Unfortunately, this seminal work rests on two fundamental errors. When these are corrected, however, Streeter points to a fully satisfying solution to the Synoptic Problem: Mark wrote first, Luke used Mark and other sources and, at a later date, Matthew conflated Mark, Luke and other sources – including some also used by Luke.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Altering the Default Setting: Re-envisaging the Early Transmission of the Jesus Tradition 1967A Primitive Version of Luke in the Composition of Matthew 1958EYE-WITNESS TESTIMONY AND THE GOSPEL TRADITION. I

Cited by

2022Eusebius the Evangelist

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.